Archive for the ‘corporate life’ Category

Ham and Egging

Saturday, February 13th, 2010

Dana Oshiro at ReadWrite Start wrote a great post on business development tricks used by startups.

I spent 6 years in business development working for 2 large, established players. One of my many responsibilities was evaluating unsolicited, incoming partnership opportunities. While I had never heard the term “ham and egging” referenced in Dana’s post, I experienced it on a regular basis. She describes it as:

…”ham and egging” was first coined by Columbia’s professor Amar Bhide and Harvard Business School’s Howard Stevenson. The term refers to the technique of convincing multiple stakeholders that others are working with you despite the fact that you’re only in talks. The only problem is that most early partners only want to work with you if other reputable partners have already signed on.

Explains Bhide and Stevenson,”the ultimate ham and egging solution is for the entrepreneur to simultaneously convince each participant that everyone else is on board, or almost on board.”

It seemed like most startups attempted to use this approach. Fortunately I knew all about it. I had seen this from the inside in prior years working at multiple startups (I was not in business development roles at these startups). This technique was specifically discussed and planned. There were other tricks, but I’ll get to those later.

It’s amazing how many people at large companies take these claims at face value. I often had to remind my peers and superiors that just because someone says they’re working with a major player doesn’t mean they are. That leaving a voicemail or sending an e-mail for someone at Google doesn’t mean that they’re “in partnership discussions” with these companies. If it’s not announced or if they don’t have a reference, then it doesn’t exist.

My point here isn’t to imply that startups are shady, though some are. My point is that you can’t always take things at face value. People at startups (especially the founders) believe in what they are doing. Many truly believe that they will eventually have the deal that they talked about. They believe that their product will do what they say it will, even though it isn’t built yet. They believe that they’ll eventually have the traffic they are promising. They just need that first deal to get it all going. The problem is that most big companies are not able to take a risk on a partner that hasn’t already proven their product. So startups are in a tough position.

Here are the tricks that I frequently saw startups using:

1) Ham and egging (as explained above). If there’s no partnership announcement or reference, then you should be skeptical.

2) Exaggerating revenue, subscribers, user base, unique visitors, etc. If they won’t show you actual traffic logs or put numbers in writing, then you should be skeptical. Confidentiality is not an excuse for not providing this information.

3) Exaggerating product capabilities. If they don’t have a fully functioning demo or don’t have it in operation with another partner,then you should be skeptical. You should insist on sending up an engineer to check out their operations.

4) “We’re going to be in town anyway, so we might as well meet in person for a demonstration.” This one always makes me laugh. While not terribly sleazy, it is annoying. I was in Dallas. No one is in Dallas “anyway” (at least not very often). I heard this from well over half of the startups trying to get in the door with us. This means I’ve literally heard this over 100 times. Don’t be pressured into wasting your time and that of your management team to meet with someone where there is no real opportunity just because “they’re going to be in town anyway.” If they tell you they’re going to be in town anyway the week of X and then tell you they can meet with you at anytime, then you know they’re lying. They should at least have the intelligence to block out a few time slots so it looks like they actually have some meetings.

Having said all of this, I did a lot of deals with startups and most of them worked out OK. The key is due diligence beyond that needed for larger potential partners. Hopefully this will help you in your future dealings with startups.

Much to Do About Nothing

Saturday, October 24th, 2009

The blogosphere is in a tissy about AT&T “encouraging” employees to contact the FCC about net neutrality. Even going so far as to suggest that management pressured employees to do this.

I call BS on this. I worked for the other evil empire – Verizon – for 7 years. We used to get e-mails from our government affairs group every so often presenting the company’s position on various issues and encouraging us to write our representatives in support of these views. These e-mails were from “corporate”, not from our business unit. Never once did anyone from our business unit nor in our chain of command ever bring up one of these e-mails. No one cared. There was no pressure. I find it very hard to believe that it would be much different at a very similar AT&T.

Maybe an E-Mail Etiquette Class Would Have Been a Better Idea

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

In an effort to increase efficiency, Nielsen has removed the “Reply to All” button from Outook. From Techcrunch:

Nielsen management, after years of research, has finally come up with an adequate solution to cluttered e-mail inboxes and inefficiency in office environments: control-deleting the reply-to-all button from the messaging software…

…In a memo, republished by Folio, Andrew Cawood, Chief Information Officer for Nielsen Company, writes that the measure will “eliminate bureaucracy and inefficiency”…

But is this really the reason for the change?

…About half a year ago Mitchell Habib, Executive Vice President at Nielsen, managed to accidentally cc all Nielsen employees in a reportedly arrogant note to another employee, ending his e-mail with the now famous-in-certain-circles punch line “Who do you work for, and why do you think copying me on this is appropriate?”.

I suspect that particular blunder led to this strange situation.

Perhaps an e-mail etiquette class and paying more attention to what you’re doing would have been a more graceful solution. Though as was stated in some of the comments, I’ve seen the “Reply to All” button bring corporate mail servers to their knees on more than one occassional even leading to a termination in one case.